Sunday, March 13, 2005

-- An Exclusive Interview with the Washington Post Managing Editor Philip Bennett

In this interview, Phillip Bennett displays an astounding cynicism toward America and it's motives in the world exceeded only by his monumentally unabashed promotion of a moral and ethical relativism.

Yong Tang: In such sense, do you think America should be the leader of the world?

Bennett: No, I don't think US should be the leader of the world. My job is helping my readers trying to understand what is happening now. What is happening now is very difficult to understand. The world is very complex. There are various complex forces occurring in it. I don't think you can imagine a world where one country or one group of people could lead everybody else. I can't imagine that could happen. I also think it is unhealthy to have one country as the leader of the world. People in other countries don't want to be led by foreign countries. They may want to have good relations with it or they may want to share with what is good in that country.
That is also a sort of colonial question. The world has gone through colonialism and imperialism. We have seen the danger and shortcomings of those systems. If we are heading into another period of imperialism where the US thinks itself as the leader of the area and its interest should prevail over all other interests of its neighbors and others, then I think the world will be in an unhappy period.

Yong Tang: So the world order should be democratic?

Bennett: Democracy means many things. How do you define democracy? As a Chinese journalist, you may have your own definition of democracy which corresponds to your history and your way of seeing the world. I may have another definition. Someone else may have their own definitions. Democracy means a lot of different things.
Let me give an example. Democracy in one sense means the majority decides, but it also means the rights of the minority are protected. As UK late Prime Minister Winston Churchill said, democracy is the least bad system that we have ever thught of. So democracy is never perfect. It always has problems. Our democracy here in the US has many contradictions, problems and challenges. So democracy is not a cure that could turn everything bad into good. It has its own advantages and its disadvantages.

If you ever had the slightest doubt that WAPO was anything but a left wing propaganda rag spewing the straight liberal party line, wonder no more. Nothing is good or evil, right or wrong, just different. One man's democracy is another man's tyranny etc. etc. etc. Rhetorical cowpies from a man with a barnfull.

2 comments:

Dr. Miller said...

Sounds like the guy is a suck up, trying to be hip and worldly for the interviewer. Typical Lib, trying to manipulate, trying to impress, too much school, too many Lib professors, too many Lib conversations over bad coffee, hates the idea that America is the leader of the world because we'll "pay any price" to remain free. Hates that Bush has a higher IQ than Kerry. Hates that Bush was right all along. Hates that Clinton and his wife tried to make nice with the enemy. Hates that we told the world to beware, we will defend ourselves! Hates that so few people trust the MSM anymore. Hates that bloggers ARE the First Amendment!!!

ctpsb said...

I second Dr. Miller's comments!!
Couldn't have said it better myself!!